Beyond the Boardroom: Why Great Leaders Struggle to Be Heard
Great leadership isn't just about having the right answers. It's about being able to communicate, challenge, influence and bring people with you - particularly when the stakes are high.
In the latest episode of The MorePeople Podcast, Andrew Fitzmaurice is joined by Sean Sankey, who leads MorePeople’s Executive Development work with senior teams across the agriculture, food and horticulture sectors.
Over the past 12 months, Sean has worked with leadership teams on everything from conflict resolution and performance management to developing talent and helping senior professionals communicate more effectively.
And despite the very different organisations involved, he has noticed one striking common thread - highly capable people can still struggle to make their message land.
Whether you're presenting to a CEO, navigating disagreement around a boardroom table, defending your team's performance or trying to get colleagues behind a new idea, technical expertise alone isn't enough.
When the stakes are high, confidence matters
One of the biggest themes Sean sees in his work is what happens when people find themselves in a "high-stakes moment". That might mean presenting to the CEO, speaking at a conference or walking into a meeting knowing that everyone around the table is likely to disagree.
In these moments, two things matter: confidence and skill.
Confidence isn't necessarily about feeling completely comfortable. It's about being able to regulate yourself, remain intentional and communicate effectively despite the pressure. The skill comes from knowing how to structure a message, understand your audience and communicate in a way that actually lands - the two go hand in hand.
You can have the best idea in the room, but if you can't communicate it effectively, it may never get the traction it deserves.
Great boards don't always agree
It can be tempting to think that a successful leadership team is one where everyone gets along and reaches agreement quickly.
In reality, healthy disagreement can be one of the most valuable things a leadership team has. Different perspectives expose blind spots. Challenge forces people to examine assumptions. And disagreement can ultimately lead to better decisions.
The important distinction is how people disagree.
The goal isn't to have the loudest voice win. It's to create an environment where people can challenge one another, explore different perspectives and ultimately leave the room aligned on the way forward. That requires confidence, trust and, perhaps most importantly, good communication.
Don't wait until communication breaks down
A recurring question in executive development is whether organisations are investing early enough. Sean sees roughly a 50/50 split between organisations seeking support proactively and those calling when things have already gone wrong. Both situations can benefit from intervention, but the lesson is clear: prevention is usually better than repair.
Preparing someone to present confidently before their first major presentation goes badly is preferable to rebuilding their confidence afterwards.
Helping a leadership team develop the skills to navigate conflict is better than waiting until relationships have completely broken down.
And equipping people to communicate effectively before they reach senior positions means they are better prepared when the stakes inevitably rise.
As Sean puts it, it's about "killing the monster whilst it's a baby."
The workplace has changed - and so has how we learn
One reason communication development has become increasingly important is the changing nature of work. Before the pandemic, many of the softer skills people developed happened almost by accident. You watched how experienced colleagues handled difficult conversations. You sat in meetings and observed how people presented. You saw how disagreement was managed. You learned through simply being around other people. That "learning by osmosis" is harder to replicate in a hybrid working environment.
At the same time, technical skills are becoming easier to develop. There are more training programmes, more resources and increasingly sophisticated technology and AI tools available. But the human skills, particularly those required when there isn't a straightforward right answer, remain much harder to develop.
How do you disagree well? How do you challenge someone more senior than you? How do you bring people around to an idea without forcing it upon them?
Those skills take practice.
Stop trying to persuade people
One of the most interesting points from the conversation is the idea that effective communication isn't necessarily about persuasion. When people become too attached to their solution, it can create friction. Instead, Sean suggests framing ideas around the audience.
Rather than:
"Here's my solution and why you should agree with me."
It's about creating enough relevance and understanding that people can engage with the idea themselves. That doesn't mean abandoning your position. It means being open enough to invite other perspectives. And often, that produces something even better than the original idea.
The best communicators aren't necessarily the people who can convince everyone to agree with them. They're the people who create enough space for better ideas to emerge.
Performance frameworks are only useful if they lead somewhere
The conversation also turns to the growing use of performance frameworks, including the nine-box model. These tools can be controversial. There is understandable concern about reducing people to a box or attaching a label to someone's career. But Sean's view is that the tool itself isn't necessarily the problem.
It's how you use it.
A nine-box assessment should be a snapshot, not a permanent label. The real value comes from what happens afterwards. If someone is identified as needing development, what happens next?
What projects will they work on?
What support will they receive?
What skills do they need to develop?
Who will mentor them?
Where could they be in six or twelve months?
If everyone is still talking about which box someone was placed in months later, the process has probably missed the point. If they're talking about their progression plan, that's where the real value lies.
Healthy organisations create movement
That idea of progression leads to another important point: talent needs movement. Progression doesn't necessarily mean a promotion. It could mean moving into another part of the business, taking responsibility for a new project, developing a new skill or gaining exposure to a different team. What matters is that people can see themselves moving forward.
When employees can see opportunities to develop and can see their colleagues progressing too, it creates a sense of momentum. When there is no movement, businesses can quickly become stagnant.
For organisations operating in sectors where retaining talented people is increasingly important, creating that sense of movement isn't just a nice-to-have. It's a strategic priority.
The best leaders aren't necessarily the loudest
Ultimately, the conversation comes back to communication. Leadership isn't simply about having the most senior job title or the strongest technical knowledge. It's about being able to bring people with you. That means being able to challenge constructively, listen properly, communicate clearly and create an environment where other people feel confident enough to contribute.
And sometimes, great leadership means knowing when not to have the answer.
The strongest leaders create the conditions for other people to contribute their expertise, challenge assumptions and come up with better solutions. Because leadership isn't just about what you say.
It's about what people hear, what they do with it, and what happens as a result.
Listen to the full episode to hear the conversation in more detail.